Reviewed the diff (README.md, +26 lines, docs-only — matches the description).
Correctness: No bugs. The Gitea branch-protection API call is accurate — branch_protections endpoint, rule_name/enable_push/enable_merge_whitelist/merge_whitelist_usernames are all real Gitea API fields, and $GITEA_URL/$GITEA_TOKEN match the env vars defined elsewhere in the repo (.env.example, agent/src/gitea.js). The token scopes listed for the bot account (repository, issue, package) line up with what the automation actually needs (PR/branch ops, issue-comment-based PR reviews, and the REGISTRY_TOKEN docker push in .gitea/workflows/build.yml).
Minor nits (not blocking):
Step 14 references "claude-bot (see below)" before step 15 actually introduces it — reads fine but the two steps would flow slightly better swapped (create the bot account, then lock branch protection to exclude it).
The step 14 curl example omits -s unlike the step 9 curl example — trivial style inconsistency.
Nothing else stands out; it's a small, self-consistent documentation addition.
Reviewed the diff (README.md, +26 lines, docs-only — matches the description).
**Correctness:** No bugs. The Gitea branch-protection API call is accurate — `branch_protections` endpoint, `rule_name`/`enable_push`/`enable_merge_whitelist`/`merge_whitelist_usernames` are all real Gitea API fields, and `$GITEA_URL`/`$GITEA_TOKEN` match the env vars defined elsewhere in the repo (`.env.example`, `agent/src/gitea.js`). The token scopes listed for the bot account (`repository`, `issue`, `package`) line up with what the automation actually needs (PR/branch ops, issue-comment-based PR reviews, and the `REGISTRY_TOKEN` docker push in `.gitea/workflows/build.yml`).
**Minor nits (not blocking):**
- Step 14 references "`claude-bot` (see below)" before step 15 actually introduces it — reads fine but the two steps would flow slightly better swapped (create the bot account, then lock branch protection to exclude it).
- The step 14 curl example omits `-s` unlike the step 9 curl example — trivial style inconsistency.
Nothing else stands out; it's a small, self-consistent documentation addition.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Docs only.
Reviewed the diff (README.md, +26 lines, docs-only — matches the description).
Correctness: No bugs. The Gitea branch-protection API call is accurate —
branch_protectionsendpoint,rule_name/enable_push/enable_merge_whitelist/merge_whitelist_usernamesare all real Gitea API fields, and$GITEA_URL/$GITEA_TOKENmatch the env vars defined elsewhere in the repo (.env.example,agent/src/gitea.js). The token scopes listed for the bot account (repository,issue,package) line up with what the automation actually needs (PR/branch ops, issue-comment-based PR reviews, and theREGISTRY_TOKENdocker push in.gitea/workflows/build.yml).Minor nits (not blocking):
claude-bot(see below)" before step 15 actually introduces it — reads fine but the two steps would flow slightly better swapped (create the bot account, then lock branch protection to exclude it).-sunlike the step 9 curl example — trivial style inconsistency.Nothing else stands out; it's a small, self-consistent documentation addition.
token scope test
Pull request closed